Comments on: Quick Upgrade Process http://erdelynet.com/tech/openbsd/quick-upgrade-process/ Mike Erdely's website (still faster than Scott's blog) Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:55:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: UNIX bits auf F!XMBR http://erdelynet.com/tech/openbsd/quick-upgrade-process/comment-page-1/#comment-3557 UNIX bits auf F!XMBR Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:51:20 +0000 http://erdelynet.com/tech/openbsd/quick-upgrade-process/#comment-3557 [...] BSD haftet immer der Ruf an, das dafür kaum Treiber existieren - andererseits beweisen selbst Systeme wie OpenBSD, deren primärer Antrieb Sicherheit ist, genau das Gegenteil. Neue Hardware in OpenBSD 4.2. Und das man ein BSD schnell updaten kann, wird hier ebenfalls am Beispiel von OpenBSD vorgeführt [...] [...] BSD haftet immer der Ruf an, das dafür kaum Treiber existieren – andererseits beweisen selbst Systeme wie OpenBSD, deren primärer Antrieb Sicherheit ist, genau das Gegenteil. Neue Hardware in OpenBSD 4.2. Und das man ein BSD schnell updaten kann, wird hier ebenfalls am Beispiel von OpenBSD vorgeführt [...]

]]> By: Gerardo Santana http://erdelynet.com/tech/openbsd/quick-upgrade-process/comment-page-1/#comment-3540 Gerardo Santana Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:17:27 +0000 http://erdelynet.com/tech/openbsd/quick-upgrade-process/#comment-3540 "I am stupidly deleting the beautiful OpenBSD artwork in this step." Oh well, who would have thought xetc42.tgz was not the only one to write in /etc. Makes me wonder why the OpenBSD artwork is in /etc and not in /usr/share, and why this artwork is separated in two packages, xbase and xshare. Don't you think? “I am stupidly deleting the beautiful OpenBSD artwork in this step.”

Oh well, who would have thought xetc42.tgz was not the only one to write in /etc.

Makes me wonder why the OpenBSD artwork is in /etc and not in /usr/share, and why this artwork is separated in two packages, xbase and xshare. Don’t you think?

]]>